The current proposal—a residential tax exemption with no income testing—shifts $5.4 million annually from part-time to year-round residents. A wealthy year-round homeowner gets the same tax break as a struggling senior. Year-round renters pay more through higher rents and get nothing back.
The Money Story: 2015 vs. 2026
Back in 2015:
Fast forward to 2026
(current fiscal year):
That's a 100-140% increase in home values and a 62% increase in the town budget in just 11 years.
Even with Proposition 2½ limiting tax increases to 2.5% per year, Chatham's money machine went into overdrive:
Property values more than doubled (automatic tax base growth)
Operating budget jumped from $27M to $44M (62% increase)
New construction added "new growth" revenue (bypasses the 2.5% cap)
The tax base grew from millions to $12.3 BILLION
Budget Growth (2015 → 2026):
Property Values:
Chatham Tax Revenue:
• • That's a 67% jump
What Chatham has is a spending question:
Should we spend $5.4 million annually helping everyone equally (including people making $300K/year)?
Or should we spend $800K helping those who actually need it?
Chatham's budget grew FASTER than inflation:
Translation: Chatham didn't just keep up—it thrived. Revenue exploded from new growth, rising values, and a tax base that hit $12.3 billion.
And NOW they claim we can't afford targeted relief? 🤨
This comparison makes it crystal clear: Chatham has the money. They're just choosing to spend it irresponsibly.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.